bjhc&im November 2003 cover

Editorial

November 2003
Volume 20 Number 9

Back to this month's contentssubscribe to bjhc&imOrder this issue

Society and people with disabilities

As the European Year of People with Disabilities draws to a close, it is appropriate for the Journal to look at some of the ways in which information and communication technologies can help the disabled. It is really only in the last quarter century that society has seriously begun to consider how to provide those resources which — particularly in terms of physical access — might ease the difficulties that some disabled people encounter. We have happily advanced beyond the point where the most cogent legislative requirement was to demand that 3% of the workforce of any large employer should be registered disabled. Current legislative requirements are far more demanding, and their effect can slowly be seen: ramps to public buildings to complement previously daunting flights of stairs are now commonplace, low-loader buses, taxis and railway carriages are not uncommon. Nor are these efforts restricted to those with problems of physical mobility: for example, both the English National Opera, and BBC News 24 regularly provide performances or bulletins that are signed for the hard of hearing. Moves such as these are greatly welcome as a sign that society as a whole is beginning to take initiatives in this field that are not driven by legislation, but which spring from a slowly growing and increasingly intelligent understanding of the needs of people with disabilities.

Where in this process do information and communication technologies fit? How can they help — and indeed do they help? In his article, Dr Geoffrey Busby, Advisor on Disability Issues to the British Computer Society (BCS), describes some of the work in this field being undertaken both by the BCS, and internationally. A glance at the programmes, both of the last and the forthcoming International Conferences on Assistive Technology, demonstrates the wide range of work in this field. Wireless information services for deaf people on the move, a rehabilitation device for the severely handicapped that can be operated by any part of the body, a project to make the Internet more accessible to the disabled, a project to help, through the provision of ITC equipment and training, the 2.8m unemployed disabled in the UK to increase their chances of employment — these are but a few examples of the way computing and technology can help the disabled.

As Dr Busby points out, however, technology and legislation alone will not suffice: there have to be positive moves to involve governments, industry and users in developing agreed ways forward.

In their article, Gill Whitney, Chairperson, and Luc Van den Berghe, Secretary, of the (European) Design-for-All and Assistive Technology Standardisation Co-ordination Group, review progress in the Group’s work. It begins from the premise that standardisation is of benefit both to older people and disabled people  by ensuring that artificial barriers to access are not built into products and services. (In passing, there is a resonance here with part three of the UK Disability Discrimination Act, which provides that from October 2004 it will be an offence “to refuse to provide, or deliberately not providing, to the disabled person any service which he provides, or is prepared to provide to members of the public”). To this end, standards have to be developed, those for whom the standards are intended have to be made aware of the needs of disabled and older people, and older and disabled people have to be made aware of the benefits that standardisation can bring. Particular stress is being laid on an approach to design activity, intended to ensure that products are usable by everyone to the greatest extent possible, without the need for specialised adaptation. For the future, the Group’s aim is that public procurement — a potent motivator for industry and suppliers — should ensure that people with disabilities should be able to make use of the same goods and services as other members of society.

Our third article on this theme is from Dr John Gill, Chief Scientist of the Royal National Institute of the Blind. He examines recent technological developments for the blind, and describes some of the benefits, both actual and potential, that ICT can offer. Specifically, however, he highlights the dearth of research into simple aids for daily living, that are unglamorous in research terms, and not highly profitable in commercial terms; and calls for a new approach to this problem.

There can be no doubt that ICT has much more to offer for people with disabilities. Of itself, however, as in so any other areas of computing, that is not enough. It requires a positive response from the whole of society to make sure that the full benefits are obtained. This is of crucial importance, and is an area that will be explored at the BCS Disability Group’s International Conference on Assistive Technology to be held in London on 2–3 December. It is certainly a topic to which the Journal will return in later issues.

Michael Fairey

 

 

To top^